Resources
Charter School Closure Guidance (upd. 1/2025) – Link
About the Charter Public School Investigation Process
In Washington, charter public schools are part of a multi-level system of accountability and oversight. One part of the Commission’s specific role is ensuring charter public schools adhere to the commitments of their contracts (their charters) and to the myriad of expectations codified in each school’s Performance Framework (learn more about Commission oversight here).
When potential issues arise during routine oversight that indicate the School may have violated its contract or the law, the Commission can initiate a process that evaluates, invites due process from the school, and ultimately issues direction on what must be remedied to maintain compliance with charter public school rules and regulations. This level of oversight is rigorous and goes beyond what is required at traditional public schools. In exchange for greater accountability, charter public schools have additional flexibility to create a learning environment that best fits the needs of its students.
It is not unusual for the Commission to investigate a charter public school, as issues can be addressed and remedied. However, a school that has fallen irreparably short of the commitments of its charter can be closed.
These processes are codified in the Washington Administrative Code 108-40.
General overview of inquiry and corrective action process:
General overview of revocation process:
- Commissioners vote on notice to revoke [this is not revocation – just first step in process].
- If the Commissioners vote to revoke, a Notice to Revoke that includes reasons for revocation and provides the Notice to school is issued.
- School may provide a written response to the Notice within 30 days of notice.
- Commission reviews the Notice to Revoke, school’s Response, and supporting evidence, and issues a Draft Resolution to revoke or not to revoke, along with any conditions if the Commission votes not to revoke.
- School may appeal (“opportunity to respond”) the Draft Resolution within 20 days.
- If school does not request an opportunity to respond, draft resolution becomes final.
- If the school does request an opportunity to respond, the matter goes to a hearing.
- Hearing
- Presiding officer from the hearing issues recommendation within 30 days of hearing.
- Commissioners consider recommendation and all evidence.
- Commissioners vote to revoke or not to revoke, and issue a final decision in form of resolution that states the reasons for the decision.
- Commission submits report of action with the resolution to the State Board and OSPI within 10 days of the resolution.
Glossary:
Inquiry/Investigation: The process the Commission uses to gather information when potential issues arise that indicate the school may have violated its contract or the law. Inquiries/investigations may include access to facilities, data, information, and staff in the manner and time frame requested by the Commission.
Charter Contract: A voluntary agreement between a charter public school’s Board and the State Charter School Commissioners. The contract is enforceable by law as a binding agreement. The School Board is a party to the contract. All contracts are posted on the Commission’s website.
Notice of Perceived Problem: The notice the Commission sends to the School Board when the Commission has reason to believe that a charter school’s performance or legal compliance is unsatisfactory. The school must respond in writing to the perceived problem. The Commission will consider the response and other evidence and information available and determine whether to take corrective action and/or impose sanctions as necessary.
Corrective Action: If the Commission finds deficiencies in a charter public school’s performance or legal compliance, the Commission requires the school to develop and comply with an approved Corrective Action Plan (CAP). The goal of corrective action is to help the school get back into compliance. The CAP must identify the date by which the deficiency will be corrected, how it will be corrected, measures to prevent future deficiencies, how the CAP will be monitored, and the person(s) responsible for monitoring and sustaining change. Not complying with or satisfying the CAP is considered grounds for revocation of the contract.
Sanctions: Sanctions (including probation) require a vote by the Commission. Sanctions may be imposed along with a CAP, or separately.
Revocation: Revocation is the termination of the charter contract based. There is a separate process for revocation. The Commission must vote to revoke.